I asked the page to be protected. As you can't use your photos in Russia, I do believe you can't anywhere else. Akhmadjan留言2019年5月16日 (四) 15:32 (UTC)回覆

@Sanmosa那些圖片確實令人惶恐,但是移除是否違反WP:NOTCENSORED。--Cohaf(talk) 2019年5月22日 (三) 10:24 (UTC)回覆
@Cohaf該圖片屬於斬首兒童,我認為可能適用WP:CHILDPROTECT法律方針。Σανμοσα 2019年5月22日 (三) 10:28 (UTC)回覆
@Cohaf還有,我認為如果真的要再度加入相關圖片的話,那也應該要在嚴謹的社羣共識下進行。Σανμοσα 2019年5月22日 (三) 10:36 (UTC)回覆
@Sanmosa如果是兒童保護,應該提交基金會,但是看了一遍C區的AFD,不是非常適合使用。這個沒有保護兒童,那個兒童已經被殺了。其餘就NOTCENSORED了。我只是認為這樣大量RR非常不妥而已。您的意見如何?--Cohaf(talk) 2019年5月22日 (三) 10:40 (UTC)回覆
@Cohaf我還是要求得到社群意見明確許可才加入。Σανμοσα 2019年5月22日 (三) 10:42 (UTC)回覆
Sanmos, these pictures have nothing to do with pedofilia, so the rule WP:CHILDPROTECT is not applicable to the case. These photos do not violate any Wikimedia's rule, because otherwise they would be removed from Commons. The first photo was twice nominated for deletion and twice kept. The other two photos were nominated for deletion by Akhmadjan, and due to my inexperience on Commons' traditions I asked Commons' administrator Elcobbola to summarize the results of discussion on the pages of nominations of these photos. But this my ask led to the fact that Elcobbola refused to summarize the results not to be accused of bias. And also I do not understand your intention to get permission to publish these photos in the article. Obviously these photos do not violate any Wikipedia's rule, so there is no reason to hide the photos. Also read the similar discussion on the English Wikipedia, please. Раммон留言2019年5月22日 (三) 10:58 (UTC)回覆
First, it is a content issue to include or exclude a picture from an article, we will decide to include or exclude based on local policies and of course WMF guidance. But to edit war with another editor here on the inclusion is a conduct issue which if you don't come to a consensus on talk page or otherwise, you will face sanctions like blocks or topic bans. @Sanmosa. 要討論是可以的,我樂意加入。--Cohaf(talk) 2019年5月22日 (三) 11:05 (UTC)回覆
Cohaf, well, how to come to a consensus in this case? Раммон留言2019年5月22日 (三) 11:26 (UTC)回覆
You may use the talk page to discuss or the link I will give you below if you cant use Chinese. If you can, feel free to visit the village pump too.--Cohaf(talk) 2019年5月22日 (三) 11:28 (UTC)回覆
The language is not the main obstacle to come to a consensus with Akhmadjan - I do not know what should I write. Раммон留言2019年5月22日 (三) 12:26 (UTC)回覆

@Akhmadjan edit war is not ok. You are warned too.--Cohaf(talk) 2019年5月22日 (三) 11:07 (UTC)回覆

2019年5月

  請使用標準漢語溝通

您好,當您參與討論時。您應該使用現代標準漢語和其他用戶進行溝通。如果您使用了現代標準漢語以外的其他語言發言,其他用戶可能因為看不懂您的發言而導致溝通不暢。如果您無法使用中文,請到這裡發言,謝謝。

  Please use Modern Chinese to communicate

You have posted comments in a language other than Modern Chinese. Please always use Chinese to communicate, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. If you do not write Chinese but need to contact zh-wikipedia, you can leave your message here. Thank You.

--Cohaf(talk) 2019年5月22日 (三) 11:28 (UTC)回覆

From what I understand, Chinese is NOT required to leave comments at the Village pump. However, my understanding from quick skimming indicated that almost all comments are left in the Chinese languages. Non-Chinese ones are most likely not replied aptly. -- Ktsquare 留言 2019年9月2日 (一) 07:51 (UTC)回覆
Yes, Ktsquare is right on this issue. It is not strictly banned to use non-Chinese in VP. My expression was not precise.--Tiger-留言2019年9月2日 (一) 08:07 (UTC)回覆
Your (Tigerzeng) expression is misleading... Also, you (Tigerzeng) follows my word conversation with other users numerous times. This time, your (Tigerzeng) comment follows only less than 1 hour after mine. I am reasonably convinced that you (Tigerzeng) are following my contribution. Please stop. I am considering reporting your (Tigerzeng) action because my security may be hurt. -- Ktsquare 留言 2019年9月2日 (一) 09:12 (UTC)回覆