約翰·古斯塔夫·德羅森

約翰·古斯塔夫·伯恩哈特·德羅森(Johann Gustav Bernhard Droysen,1808年7月6日—1884年6月19日)是德國歷史學家。他的《亞歷山大大帝史》是代表德國歷史思想新學派的第一部作品,該思想理想化了所謂的“英雄”所擁有的權力。

約翰·古斯塔夫·德羅森
出生1808年7月6日 (1808-07-06)
 普魯士王國波美拉尼亞省德雷加的特雷普托
(今波蘭切比亞圖夫)
逝世1884年6月19日 (1884-06-20)(75歲)
 德意志帝國勃蘭登堡省柏林
教育程度柏林大學
(PhD, 1831)[3]
机构柏林大學
基爾大學
耶拿大學
时代19世紀哲學
地区西方哲學
学派歷史學[1]
主要领域
史學方法
著名思想
The erkennenerklärenverstehen distinction[2]
论文De Lagidarum regno Ptolemaeo IV Philometore rege (1831)

參考資料

  • Assis, Arthur Alfaix. What Is History For? Johan Gustav Droysen and the Functions of Historiography. Berghahn Books, 2014, ISBN 978-1-78238-248-5); focus on his theory of historiography.
  • Burger, Thomas. "Droysen's Defense of Historiography: A Note页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)." History and Theory (1977): 16#2 168–173.
  • Gilbert, Felix. "The New Edition of Johann Gustav Droysen's Historik." Journal of the History of Ideas (1983): 327-336. online页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆
  • Maclean, Michael J. "Johann Gustav Droysen and the Development of Historical Hermeneutics页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)." History and Theory (1982): 347–365.
  • Momigliano, Arnaldo. "J.G. Droysen between Greeks and Jews", History and Theory, Vol. 9, No. 2. (1970), pp. 139–153.
  • Southard, Robert. Droysen and the Prussian School of History. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1995
  • Southard, Robert. "Theology in Droysen's Early Political Historiography: Free Will, Necessity, and the Historian页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)." History and Theory (1979): 378–396.

参考资料

  1. ^ Colin Cheyne, John Worrall (eds.), Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave, Springer 2006, p. 266.
  2. ^ A distinction among the three methodologies of scientific inquiry: recognising (pertaining to philosophical, theological, and speculative research), explaining (pertaining to mathematical and physical research) and understanding (pertaining to historical research); see: Johann Gustav Droysen, Grundriss der Historik, Verlag von Veit & Comp., 1868, p. 11: §14.
  3. ^ Kiel University – Famous Scholars from Kiel. [2022-07-23]. (原始内容存档于2022-08-08). 
  4. ^ 4.0 4.1 Beiser (2011), p. 295.
  5. ^ Werner Jacob Cahnman, Joseph Maier, Judith Marcus and Zoltán Tarr (ed.), Weber & Toennies: Comparative Sociology in Historical Perspective: "Max Weber and the Methodological Controversy in the Social Sciences", Transaction Publishers, 1943, p. 42, note 21.